Trust Seminar
The Trust Seminar is going to be held in 380,
Soda Hall, Berkeley this year, on Thursdays from 4pm to 5pm.
If you are visiting Soda Hall from offsite, please see
the Visitor Information page
To receive notification of future Trust Seminars, either join the
trustlocal workgroup or
the trustseminar workgroup.
Almost all members of Trust that are located at UC Berkeley
should join trustlocal
instead of joining the trustseminar group.
Spring 2007, Upcoming Trust Seminars
Past 2007 Trust Seminars
- Using Model-based Intrusion Detection for SCADA Networks
- Alfonso Valdes, SRI
4pm, Thursday, January 18, 2007, Note: Special Place 540 A/B Cory
Presentation
Abstract
In a model-based intrusion detection approach for
protecting SCADA networks, we construct models
that characterize the expected/acceptable behavior
of the system, and detect attacks that cause
violations of these models. Process control
networks tend to have static topologies, regular
traffic patterns, and a limited number of
applications and protocols running on them. Thus,
we believe that model-based monitoring, which has
the potential for detecting unknown attacks, is
more feasible for control networks than for
general enterprise networks. To this end, we
describe three model-based techniques that we have
developed and a prototype implementation of them
for monitoring Modbus TCP networks.
Bio
Alfonso Valdes, Senior Computer Scientist,
Computer Sciences Laboratory at SRI, has led
several projects in information security for such
clients as the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA) and the Advanced Research and
Development Activity (ARDA), and the Department of
Homeland Security. He has coordinated the
insertion of technology components from these and
other projects into exercises with the Army and
Navy. He is an expert on statistical algorithms
for detection and modeling and the application of
such techniques in the information security arena.
He has led statistical algorithm development in
SRI's Next-Generation Intrusion Detection Expert
System (NIDES) and later EMERALD. Mr. Valdes has
implemented a high-speed Bayes component to detect
network intrusions, as well as an innovative
probabilistic approach to correlation of reports
from heterogeneous intrusion detection sensors.
In the EMERALD project, he has developed and
improved algorithms from the standpoint of
detection performance, false alarm rate, and
computational efficiency. He holds two patents in
the field of computer intrusion detection.
Mr. Valdes is also an expert on a wide variety of
statistical and classification techniques,
including likelihood theory, decision analysis,
neural networks, simulation, and Bayesian
formalisms. He has applied these methods with
great success in a number of problem domains,
including signal processing and environmental and
medical sciences, in addition to information
security.
More recently he has introduced ultra-scalable
methods to visualize unusual or potentially
malicious activity at very high levels in computer
networks. Over the last two years, he has taken an
interest in critical infrastructure systems such
as the distributed control and SCADA systems that
operate refineries and pipelines in the Oil and
Gas sector.
Mr. Valdes holds an M.S. (1983) in operations
research from Stanford University.
- Security is broken
-
Rik Farrow (Security consultant and author)
Note: Special Day: 4pm, Wednesday, January 31, 2007, 540 A/B Cory
Presentation
Abstract
Our computer security model is broken. Worse yet, it never
really has worked ... all certainly desktops and laptops, but also
most servers. The current security model was not designed to protect
users from themselves, and this goes a long way towards understanding
why security is so difficult. I end by looking at strategies for
improving security -- but no real solutions. The point is to start
thinking outside of the box, while adopting best practices today. What
we have done in the past has not worked, and can not work. We need to
look at the security model in a new way, and that is the real point of
this presentation.
Bio
"Rik Farrow provides UNIX and Internet security consulting and
training. He has been working with UNIX system security since 1984,
and with TCP/IP networks since 1988. He has taught for NASA,
Department of Justice, NSA, US West, Canadian RCMP, Swedish Navy, CSI,
USENIX, and for many US and European user groups. Farrow also consults
with firms in the design and implementation of security applications,
and works with organizations to create secure firewalls and Internet
facing servers."
"He is the author of UNIX System Security, published by
Addison-Wesley in 1991 and System Administrator's Guide to System V
(Prentice Hall, 1989, with Rebecca Thomas). Farrow is the Editor of
;login:, the magazine of the USENIX association (USENIX). His article
on the technical details of the Internet Worm won an Excellence in
Technology Communications award. Farrow was featured in an article
about Internet Security in a December 1997 article in ComputerWorld. "
- Integrated Industrial Wireless Systems - Implications for Everyone
Peter Fuhr, Apprion Inc.
4pm, Thursday, February 8, 2007, 380 Soda
Presentation
Abstract
The list of wireless devices goes on and on (cell phones, pagers,
WiFi, RFID, remote controls, GPS devices, etc.) as does their use in
industrial settings. Coupled into the mix are various flavors of
industrial strength wireless field devices, embedded controllers,
network connections between corporate sites around the planet, with
perhaps even some backhaul infrastructure. But this setting isn't
your Mother's kitchen...
Questions frequently arise when systems designed for one environment
are used in another - such as the potentially hazardous environments
found in many industrial settings. Enter the world of intrinsic
safety, NEMA enclosures, Class Division 1 operation, etc. The
requirements placed on these devices and systems is much more
restrictive than the WiFi access point that you have in your house.
Coupled with the safe operation of such devices, comes a multitude of
security questions that may arise through the incorporation of
wireless into an industrial plant.
This presentation/discussion is aimed at addressing this maze of
issues. Specific integrated industrial installations will be
discussed along with the associated applications and the ever-present
pulse of applicable standards (with a special update on all things
SP100).
Bio
Dr. Peter Fuhr, Chief Technology Officer, Apprion, Inc., NASA Ames
Research Center, Moffett Field CA has hundreds of publications and
presentations within the realm of sensing systems and wireless
network connectivity. He has embedded sensors into various
structures worldwide ranging from buildings, dams, airplanes, hot air
balloon, spacecraft, nuclear power plant containment vessels, even
humans. His pioneering work in networked sensor systems for
structures earned him the Presidential Award for Excellence in
Research. Dr. Fuhr left the shelter of academia for the corporate
world in 2003. He has served on the Technical and/or Advisory Boards
for numerous companies and has performed technical consulting for
over 60 companies. Segments of his research activities are featured
in the SPIE Milestone Series on Fiber Optics. Dr. Fuhr is an
Executive Member of the Wireless Industrial Networking Alliance and
chairs two committee of ISA’s SP100 (the standard for Industrial
Wireless): (1) Interoperability and Wireless Sensor Networking and
(2) Inventory Management (Industrial RFID/RTLS). Dr. Fuhr serves on
various industrial, academic and governmental panels while striving
to bring integrated wireless and wired communications and sensing
systems to the industrial sector.
- Covert Timing Channels over IP
-
Carla Brodley, Tufts University
4pm, Thursday, February 22, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
Indirect communication channels have been
effectively employed in the communications world
to bypass mechanisms that do not permit direct
communication between unauthorized parties. Such
covert channels emerge as a threat to information
-sensitive systems in which leakage to
unauthorized parties may be unacceptable. In this
talk, we present several IP-based covert channels
and methods for detecting or rate limiting them.
We first illustrate that traffic analysis can
counter traditional event-based IP covert
channels, which do not employ any additional
scheme to obfuscate the channel. We then
introduce a new family of covert channels, which
transmit covert messages by adjusting packet
timings consistent with inter-arrival time
sequences that are extracts from recently
recorded normal sequences. Under certain
assumptions and lowered data rates, these
"time-replay" covert channels generate output
sequences that are sufficiently similar to
normal sequences, allowing them to by-pass traffic
anomaly detection schemes that are based on
distribution analysis. Additionally, we illustrate
that time-replay channels can potentially survive
channel elimination schemes such as jammers and
network data pumps with lowered data rates. Thus,
we discuss two types of transformations on packet
inter-arrival times to increase the efficacy of
existing elimination schemes.
Bio
Carla E. Brodley is a professor in the Department
of Computer Science at Tufts University. She
received her PhD in computer science from the
University of Massachusetts, at Amherst in 1994.
From 1994-2004, she was on the faculty of the
School of Electrical Engineering at Purdue
University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Professor
Brodley's research interests include machine
learning, data mining and computer security.
She has worked in the areas of intrusion
detection, anomaly detection in networks, hardware
support for security, classifier formation,
unsupervised learning and applications of machine
learning to remote sensing, computer security,
digital libraries, astrophysics, chemistry
and content-based image retrieval of medical
images. She was a member of the 2004/2005
Defense Science Study Group. In 2001 she served as
program co-chair for the International Conference
on Machine Learning (ICML) and in 2004, she served
as the general chair for ICML. Currently she is an
associate editor of Computers and Security and the
Machine Learning Journal. She is a member of the
Computing Research Association's Committee on the
Status of Women in Computing Research (CRA-W).
- I Think I Voted: E-Voting vs. Democracy
-
David L. Dill, Stanford University
4pm, Thursday, March 1, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
Touch-screen voting machines store records of cast votes in internal
memory, where the voter cannot check them. Because of our system of
secret ballots, once the voter leaves the polls there is no way anyone
can determine whether the vote captured was what the voter intended.
Why should voters trust these machines?
In January 2003, I drafted a "Resolution on Electronic Voting" stating
that every voting system should have a "voter verifiable audit trail,"
which is a permanent record of the vote that can be checked for
accuracy by the voter, and which is saved for a recount if it is
required. I posted the page with endorsements from many prominent
computer scientists. At that point, I became embroiled in a
nationwide battle for voting transparency that has continued now
for three years.
In this talk, I will discuss the basic principles and issues in
electronic voting.
Bio
David L. Dill is a Professor of Computer Science at Stanford
University, where he has been on the faculty since 1987. His primary
research interest is formal verification of systems, the goal of which
is to find design errors in systems, or prove that they are correct.
He has authored over 100 academic publications on this subject, and is
listed as a highly cited author by ISI. He is a Fellow of the
Institute of Electronic and Electrical Engineers (IEEE) and a Fellow
of the Association for Computing Machinery.
Prof. Dill is the author of the "Resolution on Electronic Voting",
which has been endorsed by many computer technologist as well as
political scientists, lawyers, and other individuals. He served on
the California Secretary of State's Ad Hoc Committee on Touch Screen
Voting, the DRE Citizen's Oversight Committee for Santa Clara County,
California, and the IEEE P1583 voting standards committee. He has
testified before the Carter-Baker Commission on Federal Election
Reform, the U.S. Senate Rules and Administration Committee, and the
U.S. Election Assistance Commission. He received the Electronic
Frontier Foundation's "Pioneer Award" in 2004 for his work on
electronic voting. He is the founder of VerifiedVoting.org and the
Verified Voting Foundation, non-profit organizations that champion
publicly verifiable elections in the United States, and
a member of the National Committee for Voting Integrity
(www.votingintegrity.org).
- Incorporating Privacy Values, Policies and Law in Information Systems
-
Annie I. Antón, North Carolina State University
4pm, Thursday, March 8, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
Effective solutions for privacy protection are of interest to industry, government and society at large, but the challenge is to satisfy the often-conflicting requirements of all these stakeholders. Legislation (such as HIPAA, COPPA and GLBA) that constrains privacy and security practices within systems and organizations present additional technical challenges. This talk will discuss mechanisms that enterprises can use to ensure that their systems are compliant with both the policies they articulate and law. Additionally, we will address the need to understand how to specify, deploy, communicate and enforce transparent privacy policies. Legislators and regulatory bodies need mechanisms to verify how privacy- related laws are actually enforced by enterprises in their software systems. To this end, we are developing compliance monitors to detect violation of stakeholder rights and obligations as expressed in law. Finally, end- users must be able to easily understand privacy policies and need effective, transparent and comprehensible online privacy-protection mechanisms -- we will discuss results of our most recent survey of 975 Internet users in which we compared various ways to represent privacy policies to online healthcare
Bio
Dr. Annie I. Antón is an Associate Professor of Software Engineering in the College of Engineering at the North Carolina State University. She is director of ThePrivacyPlace.Org (http://theprivacyplace.org), and co-director of the NC State Electronic Commerce Studio. Dr. Antón was awarded an NSF CAREER Award in 2000, named a CRA Digital Government Fellow in 2002, nominated and selected for the 2004-2005 IDA/DARPA Defense Science Study Group, and received the CSO (Chief Security Officer) Magazine "Woman of Influence in the Public Sector" award at the 2005 Executive Women's Forum. She is associate editor of IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, the cognitive issues area editor for the Requirements Engineering Journal and a member of the International Board of Referees for Computers & Security. She is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals, a senior member of the IEEE as well as a member of the ACM U.S. Public Policy Executive Committee. Antón currently serves on several boards: the NSF CISE Advisory Council, the CRA Board of Directors, the Distinguished External Advisory Board for the TRUST Research Center at U.C. Berkeley, the CRA-W Board, and an Intel advisory board. She received her B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in Computer Science in 1990, 1992, and 1997, respectively, from the College of Computing at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. Her URL is: http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/anton.
- Unconditionally Secret Key Agreement using Public Discussion
-
Amin Gohari, University of California, Berkeley
4pm, Thursday, March 15, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
In many environments requiring secret key generation, it is possible to provide external randomness to the agents. For example, sensor networks are often deployed in places where it is possible to beam randomness, e.g. from a satellite. Information theoretic security is the most stringent form of security. While once commonly considered infeasible in view of Shannon’s one time pad result, the recognition that externally provided randomness can be used to create information theoretically secure keys has led to a rethinking of this pessimistic viewpoint and to significant work over the last decade in to develop protocols to extract high rate secret keys in such situations.
We study the fundamental problem in information-theoretic cryptography in which a group of agents together with an eavesdropper have access to possibly correlated random sources. We study the secret key rate of the parties (secret from eavesdropper). Our current results strictly improve the best known bounds on the secrecy capacity. The results further relate and improve several earlier results in this area which had been studied separately.
Bio
Amin Aminzadeh Gohari is a graduate student at the university of California Berkeley working under the supervision of Professor Venkat Anantharam.
- Vulnerabilities in First-Generation RFID-enabled Credit Cards
-
Kevin Fu, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
4pm, Thursday, March 22, 2007, 380 Soda
Presentation
Abstract
RFID technology appears in a huge array of products ranging from clothing and airport luggage to subway tickets and credit cards. This talk will examine recent privacy and security vulnerabilities discovered in RFID-enabled credit cards. An estimated 20 million RFID-enabled credit cards are already in circulation in the United States. Using samples from a variety of RFID-enabled credit cards, our study observes that the cardholder's name and often credit card number and expiration are leaked in plaintext to unauthenticated readers, our homemade device costing around $150 effectively clones one type of skimmed cards thus providing a proof-of-concept implementation for the RF replay attack, information revealed by the RFID transmission cross contaminates the security of RFID and non-RFID payment contexts, and RFID-enabled credit cards are susceptible in various degrees to a range of other traditional RFID attacks such as skimming and relaying.
Bio
Kevin Fu is an assistant professor in the Department of Computer
Science at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, and is the
coordinator of the RFID Consortium on Security and Privacy (RFID
CUSP). His research interests in secure computer systems include
secure storage, RFID security, file systems, Web security, and
cryptography. Kevin's contributions include key regression for
efficient decentralized access control of storage; the SFS read-only
file system for fast integrity-protected content distribution; proxy
re-encryption file systems for managing distributed access control;
and the security analysis of RFID-enabled credit cards, Web
authentication, and software updates. Kevin received his M.Eng. and
Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1999 and 2005 respectively,
and his S.B. in Computer Science and Engineering from MIT in 1998. He
has served on numerous program committees of prestigious conferences
including the IEEE Symposium on Security & Privacy, the Network and
Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS), and the USENIX Security
Symposium. His research has appeared in The New York Times and The
Wall Street Journal. Kevin also holds a certificate of achievement in
artisanal bread making from the French Culinary Institute.
- Selling Security to Software Developers: Lessons Learned While Building a Static Analysis Tool
-
Brian Chess, Fortify Software
4pm, Thursday, April 12, 2007, 380 Soda
Slides
Abstract
Over the past ten years, static analysis has undergone a rebirth in both the
academic and the commercial world. At the same time, security has become a
critical topic for software makers. At the confluence of these trends is a
new crop of static analysis tools that identify software security bugs in
source code.
This talk covers what I have learned during the process of creating and
selling a commercial static analysis product. Some of the lessons about
static analysis are intuitive (better analysis results lead to better
sales), while some are not (when a customer says "false positive" what they
mean is "result I do not like"). In addition to relating my experience with
static analysis, I will take a look at the differences between software
security as addressed in the academic community and as practiced by software
developers in the "real world."
Bio
Brian Chess is Chief Scientist at Fortify Software. His work focuses on
practical methods for creating secure systems. Brian draws on his previous
research in integrated circuit test and verification to find new ways to
uncover security issues before they become security disasters.
Brian received his Ph.D. in computer engineering from the University of
California at Santa Cruz, where he studied the application of static
analysis to the problem of finding security-relevant defects in source code.
Prior to joining Fortify, Brian spent a decade in Silicon Valley working at
both big and small companies and thinking about both software and hardware
problems. Small companies and software problems came out on top.
- Elections and Computers: A Match Made ... Somewhere?
-
Matt Bishop, University of California, Davis
4pm, Thursday, April 19, 2007, 380 Soda
Slides
Abstract
Electronic voting systems are becoming ubiquitous. Introduced originally to reduce problems of interpreting marked ballots, electronic voting systems have created new problems as well as solved old ones. This talk will discuss the role of electronic voting systems in elections, examine the problems and benefits of the systems, and discuss the nature and role of the Federal and state standards for these systems.
Bio
Matt Bishop received his Ph.D. in computer science from Purdue University, where he specialized in computer security, in 1984. He is on the faculty at the Department of Computer Science at the University of California at Davis. His main research area is the analysis of vulnerabilities in computer systems, including modeling them, building tools to detect vulnerabilities, and ameliorating or eliminating them. He is active in information assurance education, and is a charter member of the Colloquium on Information Systems Security Education. He has been active in the area of UNIX security since 1979, and has presented tutorials at SANS, USENIX, and other conferences. His textbook, Computer Security: Art and Science, was published in December 2002 by Addison-Wesley Professional. He also teaches software engineering, machine architecture, operating systems, programming, and (of course) computer security.
- Know Thyself: Monitoring Your Network for Fun and Prophet[sic]
-
John McHugh, Dalhousie University, Canada
4pm, Thursday, May 3, 2007, 380 Soda
Slides
Abstract
Routine acquisition and aggregation of network data offers an
opportunity to understand some of the forces that drive the
internet. It also offers an opportunity to detect and understand a
variety of phenomena that are related to overtly questionable or
malicious activities on the part of network users and abusers. Carried
out on a smaller scale, if offers an opportunity to perform passive
monitoring on the activities on your own network, including the
detection of spyware and other forms of compromise. By monitoring the
unoccupied portions of an organization's address space, scanning and
other activities that are often precursors to attacks can be identified.
In this talk, I will summarize a variety of large and small scale
observations that have resulted from such monitoring activities. Key
to this work is the choice of suitable abstractions for the
representation of both data and analysis results. The talk will also
consider some of the issues associated with the management of the
quantities of the data involved as well as techniques for analyzing
the data and presenting the analysis results. These techniques aid
system managers in better understanding the activities that routinely
occur on their networks and provide a baseline against which changes
in behavior, whether benign or malicious can be evaluated.
Bio
John McHugh is a professor and Canada Research Chair in Privacy and
Security at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS where he also directs
the Privacy and Security Laboratory. Before joining the faculty at
Dalhousie, he was a senior member of the technical staff at the CERT
Coordination Center, part of the Software Engineering Institute at
Carnegie Mellon University where he did research in survivability,
network security, and intrusion detection. He was also affiliated with
CyLab and the Center for Wireless and Broadband Research, both part of
the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at CMU.
Prior to joining CERT, Dr. McHugh was a professor and chairman of the
Computer Science Department at Portland State University in Portland,
Oregon where he held a Tektronix Professorship. He has been a member
of the research faculty at the University of North Carolina and has
taught at UNC and at Duke University. For a number of years,
Dr. McHugh was a Vice President of Computational Logic, Inc., a
contract research company formed to further the application of formal
methods of software design and analysis in support of security and
safety critical systems. While at CLI, he developed tools for the
analysis of covert channels in multilevel secure systems and worked on
the problems associated with the efficient implementation of formally
specified systems. He has also worked for the Research Triangle
Institute, the Naval Research Laboratory, the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, the University of Minnesota, and the
U.S. Patent Office.
Dr. McHugh received his PhD degree in computer science from the
University of Texas at Austin. He has a MS degree in computer science
from the University of Maryland, and a BS degree in physics from Duke
University. He is the author of numerous technical papers and
reports. He has served as the chair of the IEEE Computer Society's
Technical Committee on Security and Privacy and is a member of the
advisory board for the International Journal of Information Security.
He serves on the program or advisory committees of many of the major
conferences and workshops in the computer security field.
- Where's Waldo's Computer?
-
Emin Gun Sirer, Cornell University
4pm, Thursday, May 10, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
Determining the location of nodes in a network is a basic building block
operation that enables many interesting, location-aware applications. In
this talk, I will describe efficient and effective localization
techniques we have developed for wired and wireless networks. I'll first
describe how to efficiently determine the location of nodes in a
wireless network without having to use expensive and energy-consuming
specialized hardware such as GPS receivers. The key to our approach is
to cast the localization problem as a constraint system, extract
constraints aggressively from the MAC layer, and solve the system with
the aid of a few landmarks. I'll then describe how to efficiently
resolve relative geographic queries, of the form "where is the node with
the lowest latency to CNN?", in wide area networks. The key to our
approach is to build a specialized overlay where every node has
authoritative information for the nodes in its vicinity and just enough
information for nodes farther away. Finally, I'll describe how to
determine the physical location of an Internet host based solely on
network measurements, by combining the two techniques. All three systems
have been deployed in the real world, and I'll report results from these
deployments.
Bio
Gun Sirer is an assistant professor in the Computer Science Department at Cornell University. He works on self-organizing systems, which span operating systems, networking and distributed systems. Much of his research emphasizes building systems based on principled reasons for their correct functioning. His current projects involve peer-to-peer systems, systems support for ad hoc networks, and operating systems.
- Insanity Rules: The Growing Cybersecurity Crisis
-
Gene Spafford, Purdue University
4pm, Thursday, May 17, 2007, 380 Soda
Abstract
For a number of years now, IT sector companies seem to have been taking
cyber security quite seriously. Software vendors maintain websites devoted
to the security of their products and release vulnerability warnings and
patches. PC manufacturers supply antivirus and personal firewall software
with their computers. Most police forces around the world have units
fighting cyber crime. Yet, despite all these efforts, internet crimes
and malicious behavior show no sign of abating. The flow of unsolicited
emails is stronger than ever. Why is this so? What is the real state of
cyber crime and cyber security, and what can be done to improve the current
situation? These and other questions will be examined by Prof.
Spafford in his talk.
Bio
Eugene H. Spafford is one of the most senior and recognized leaders in the field of computing. He has an on-going record of accomplishment as a senior advisor and consultant on issues of security, cybercrime and policy to a number of major companies, law enforcement organizations, and government agencies, including Microsoft, Intel, Unisys, the US Air Force, the National Security Agency, the GAO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, and two Presidents of the United States.
Dr. Eugene Spafford is a professor with a joint appointment in Computer Sciences and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University, where he has served on the faculty since 1987. He is also a professor of Philosophy (courtesy) and a professor of Communication (courtesy). He is the Executive Director of the Purdue University Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security (CERIAS).
As of 2007, Dr. Spafford is also an Adjunct Professor of Computer Sciences at the University of Texas at San Antonio, and is Executive Director of the Advisory Board of the new Institute for Information Assurance there.
-
Details about how the seminar is managed can be found at
How is the TRUST Seminar managed?
Other Seminars
|